Polish Londoner

These are the thoughts and moods of a born Londoner who is proud of his Polish roots.



Thursday, 28 July 2022

At night I hallucinate, in the day I grapple with reality


 29th July 2022 London

At night I hallucinate and shudder in fear. I wake after a nightmare while I walk  at night across a bridge without an exit. The only bus is not going my way. I am still overwhelmed by worry over some unresovable problem that I cannot formulate but it is eating into my soul.

In the day I grapple with a grim reality of frustration so much is unresolves while I feel less and les competent to solve it.

Ahead of me, Albina and I face wanting to celebrate our fiftieth anniversary with friends, but Albina still feels too weak to celebrate following her fourth (double) kidney operation as well as the covid that followed that caught us both in the 40 degree heat haze that laid us both low.

I wait too for half a year now for the result of my Wikipedia application as I shudder to think how my biography will be shredded, or perhaps not even appear at all. The history of my career and my life's work lies buried while the researchers grapple with numerous references to me in books whci they consider unreliable records. How can I show my sceptical son and younger people that I know who or what I was.

But most of all I fear the Round the World Trip from February next year, to which we foolishly signed up last year at the height of pandemic, and to which we have paid a substantial deposit. It is now only 207 days away. I have little sense of the positive anticipation we both felt when we first booked it in early 2021. It followed repeated cancellations of planned trips to Poland, to Mauritius, wherever. With this horrendous commitment to a journey of 80 days, I fear for the survival of our relationship, as are expectations are so different. For me it is an opportunity to lead an active social life and record my experiences for posterity. Fo Albina it is an opportunity for rest and for anonymity. Even more, I fear for my sanity, living in a cramped cabin, with all sense of responsibility gone, other than than our survival and our sustaining the discipline of our daily medicine intake. We will feel uprooted not only geographically, but also because our sense of time will be in flux, as we systemically cross longitude after longitude and time zone after time zone, constantly adjusting the timeclock on our phones, and losing hours from our day.

What can keep me sane? Writing a journal and contact with friends. Only they can save us. But will Albina tolerate my writing? Will I have the strength of purpose to continue it? Yet without that journal I feel that the whole journey would be just an empty vacuum in a hitherto busy life, a journey without a compass, without an end destination, other to return again to the beginning. 

Sunday, 29 May 2022

Nuremberg 2.0

 




Dear Editor,

On reading Andrew Roth’s report that “Fears grow of Russian show trials as pretext for invasion” (28.05.22), I remembered how the lead American prosecutor at the earlier Nuremberg trials, Robert H. Jackson, believed that Russian participation in those trials nearly undermined their overall credibility. After all, the Soviet Union had been responsible for as many, if not more, mass murders than Nazi Germany, albeit over a much longer period. It did not help that the Soviet judge and chief prosecutor had played critical roles in Stalin’s infamous show trials of the 1930s. In particular, one remembers the cynical attempt by the Soviet prosecutor to introduce the Soviet massacre of Polish officers in Katyn as a German crime. Ultimately, because of the participation of Western jurists in dissecting the well documented and appalling Nazi German crimes, particularly those committed in Russia and Poland, the Nuremberg trial verdicts were justified and vindicated by history.

The threatened reactivation of a “Nuremberg 2.0”, however, run solely by Russian judges, would be seen as a mockery of justice, even if some genuine excesses by Ukrainian soldiers were to be revealed. I believe that it is up to the United Nations General Assembly to authorize an international tribunal on crimes committed in Ukraine when the war is over, and both Russian and Ukrainian prosecutors could then be given the chance to bring their evidence of real and alleged war crimes to the court, even if most of the accused would be tried “in absentia”.  In the meantime, the courageous Mariupol survivors should be exchanged with Russian prisoners held by the Ukrainians, and not tried as criminals in a tendentious show trial.

Yours faithfully,


Wiktor Moszczynski

Letter sent to The Guardian 28.05.2022

Tuesday, 19 April 2022

96,296 Polish electors in London and 55 Polish candidates


 


                                                            P R E S S       R E L E A S E


There are currently 96,296 Polish citizens on the electoral roll in the 33 London Boroughs who are eligible to vote in the local elections on Thursday May 5th. This constitutes 1.57% of the total electorate of 6,116,260 in Greater London (ONS statistics - December 2020). The Federation of Poles in Great Britain CIO, which is an umbrella structure for Polish organizations in Great Britain and has served as the voice of the Polish community in this country since 1946, is urging as many UK citizens of Polish origin, as well as Polish citizens resident in the UK, to take an active part in the local elections in London and elsewhere in the United Kingdom. 

The various Polish communities throughout London have been in the forefront in the massive generous relief effort for Ukrainian refugees, since the first day of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on February 24th. Polish community centres in London and elsewhere have acted as the first hub in their local area for financial and material donations to assist Ukraine and its refugees. Polish voters in London will want to see that local council candidates support continuing the relief effort for Ukrainians, and they have been critical of the administrative delays in offering Ukrainian refugees asylum in Britain. 

There is also considerable concern, already voiced by Dr Włodzimierz Mier-Jędrzejowicz, President of the Federation of Poles, in his letter on 24th June 2021 to the Prime Minister, at delays and mistakes in granting full settled status to so many Polish and other EU citizens. 

There has been more coverage of these elections than previously in the Polish London media, both in printed magazines and on Polish websites. Our member organizations have been appealing to their members to ensure they are registered to vote and to participate actively in the local elections. For instance, Polish Migrants Organize for Change (POMOC) is campaigning to maximize the number of Polish female voters, and are prioritizing registration drives for all potential Polish electors in Ealing, Hounslow, Lewisham and Waltham Cross.  
 
The attached statistical table indicates a further gradual reduction in the total number of Polish electors in London. This was foreseeable in view of decisions by some Polish families to return to Poland following uncertainties over settled status, while others have opted to apply for UK citizenship and consequently no longer appear as Polish citizens on the electoral roll. In fact, there is a 3.7% drop in the number of Polish electors in relation to the previous year and a 12.6% reduction in comparison to 2018, when the Polish electorate statistics had finally peaked in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit Referendum. 

As usual, the largest concentrations of Polish electors are in Ealing (12377) and Hounslow (7570), and then Brent (5274), Croydon (5029), Barnet (4594), Haringey (4537), Merton (4608) and Hillingdon (4501). 

A total of 55 candidates in London appear to be of Polish extraction. They are on the lists of 19 of the London Boroughs. These candidates include 27 Conservatives (18 of them in Hackney and 4 in Haringey), 7 Labour, 8 Liberal Democrats, 11 Greens and 2 from other parties (see below).

Wiktor Moszczynski,
Research Officer
Federation of Poles in Great Britain, 238-240 King Street, London W6 0RF,


List of Borough Council candidates in Greater London of Polish extraction

Borough             Ward                                Name                                                            Party

Bexley                Kelsey & Eden Park        John Paul Gorski                         Lib Democrat

Camden              Fortune Green                Richard Olszewski                        Labour

Croydon             Park Hill & Whitgift        Szymon Zaborski                        Lib Democrat

Ealing                 Greenford Broadway    Jan Andrew Gaca                           Green

                            Hanger Hill                       Michal Solski                            Green

                            Northolt West End         Natalia Kubica                             Green

                            Walpole                            Monika Williams                Conservative

Enfield                Bowes                              Daniel Szymon Stachow            Green

                            Edmonton Green           Peter Krakowiak                           Green

Hackney             Brownswood                  Joanna Zolnierzak                    Conservative

                            Clissold                             Diana Mikolajewska            Conservative

                            Clissold                             Monika Nierzejewska          Conservative

                            Clissold                             Julia Zolnierzak                   Conservative

                            Hackney Central             Stefan Liberadzki                      Green

                            Hackney Downs              Agnieszka Cuellar-Bridy      Conservative

                            Hackney Downs              Nikodem Mikolajewski         Conservative

                            Hackney Downs              Joanna Wojciechowska         Conservative

                            Hackney Wick                 Piotr Lipinski                        Conservative

                            Hackney Wick                 Piotr Pietrzyk                        Conservative

                            Hackney Wick                 Anna Socha                           Conservative

                            Haggerston                      Karolina Bugaric                   Conservative

                            Lea Bridge                        Marzena Sterner                  Conservative

                            Lea Bridge                        Sally Zlotovitz                          Green

                            Shacklewell                     Andrzej Krajewski                Conservative

                            Springfield                       Simche Steinberger              Conservative

                            Stoke Newington            Anna Chomicz                       Conservative

                            Stoke Newington            Weronika Zolnierzak             Conservative

                            Victoria                            Monika Hoppe                      Conservative

                            Woodbury Down           Agnieszka Wypych                 Conservative

Haringey            Bruce Castle                    Agnieszka Bielecka               Conservative

                            Tottenham Central        Agnieszka Adrjanowicz          Conservative

                            Tottenham Hale             Peter Gorski                           Conservative

                            West Green                     Richard Siemicki                  Lib Democrat

                            White Hart Lane             Jeremy Krynicki                   Conservative

Harrow               Pinner South                   Zbigniew Kowalczyk                Reform UK

                            West Harrow                  Monika Sobiecki                       Green

Havering            Goosehays                      Emilia Kukielka                         Conservative

                            Harold Wood                  Krystyna Koseda                       Labour

                            St Edwards                      Karen Kruzycka                       Green

Hounslow          Osterley & Springrove   Judith Kowalczyk                       Lib Democrat

Islington             Junction                           Stefan Krawczyk                      Lib Democrat

Kensington & Chelsea Colville                    Alex Nowak                            Lib Democrat

                            Dalgarno                          Theodore Karpinski                Conservative

Kingston   St Marks &Seething Wells       Deborah Olszewski        Womens Equality

Lambeth            Vauxhall                           Liam Jarnecki                           Labour

Lewisham          Evelyn                               Tim Reczek                             Conservative

                          Catford South                 Eva Stamirowski                      Labour

                          Hither Green                   Jane Alaszewska                      Lib Democrat

                          Lee Green                        Miki Jablkowska                     Green

                          Rushey Green                 Louise Krupski                         Labour

Merton               Lavender Fields              Slawek Szczepanski                Labour

Newham            Forest Gate South          Olenka Gradosielska                Conservative

Southwark         Peckham Rye                   Renata Hamvas                      Labour

Wandsworth     Thamesfield                    Penny Staniaszek                     Green

                         Tooting Broadway         Stephen Bieniek                Lib Democrat         

Totals:  55 candidates

Of which:   Conservative  27       Labour 7             Lib Dems 8         Green 11                Others 2

                                         

                                                                                     


Thursday, 7 April 2022

UK and Polish "useful idiots"

 From Wiktor Moszczynski,


Dear Sirs,
I was intrigued by the description of Boris Johnson as the suggested mediator between Germany and Poland in their contrasting response to the war in Ukraine. Patrick Wintour seems to approve Jonson's credentials in his piece "Johnson is an unlikely bridge builder" (Guardian 07.04.2022), but the poisoned relationship between Germany and the current Polish leadership will remain. While it is true that the UK and Poland still see eye to eye on a strong commitment to supply arms and material support to Ukraine, and are more determined then Germany and France in pressing for stronger sanctions, they are also united by their consistent negativity towards Brussels and to the current French and German leadership, even to the extent of publicly sniping at Macron as he desperately battles the pro-Putin nationalist forces which challenge his presidency next week. 
In the past Lenin mocked European politicians and writers who sympathised with Soviet Russia as "useful idiots". Now Boris Johnson and Polish prime minister Mateusz Morawiecki have both played the role of "useful idiots" to the Putin political agenda in the last 5 years as they have sought to undermine the liberal principles and the unity of the European Union, which Putin and his more overt European allies (Orban, LePen, Farage) are determined to destroy. In fact, Brussels and Berlin suspect that despite the hostility of UK and Poland to Putin, their temporarily concealed anti-European agenda remains in place, as they await the triumphant return of the arch "useful idiot", President Trump in 2024.
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski
Sent to the Guardian   07.04.2022

Russian tradition of mass executions



 Dear Editor,

Michael Day is right to draw on the past history of mass executions by Russia when referring to the killings in Ukraine "Russia's sheer brutality an all-too-familiar trait" "i" 05.04.2022). It is not just the executions with hands tied behind their backs and a bullet in the back of the head that link up Bucha, Grozny and the mass executions of 22,000 Polish officers and civic leaders in 1940 in the Katyn Forest and other sites in Russia. There is also the persistence of denial and lies that go with it. The truth about the Katyn atrocities was denied by successive Russian governments until 1990. Russia has an unenviable record both of massacre and mendacity that goes back more than a century.
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski
Spokesman
Federation of Poles in Great Britain
Sent to "i"                     on 4th April

Sunday, 20 March 2022

Poland at a watershed as Russia’s war with Ukraine intensifies

 



In the last month Poland has become the centre of world attention, due in part to its role as the crucial land link to embattled Ukraine, and partly to the impressive way it offered safe haven for the three million refugees escaping from the Ukrainian battle zones. For adult Poles, however, the invasion of Ukraine is almost déjà vu.

Just as Poland in September 1939 fought alone against Hitler and Stalin, while the world looked on and expressed only moral support, so today Ukraine is defying Putin alone, while other countries like Poland sympathise but stand back. Yet, like France and Britain in 1939, Poland also knows that in 2022 it could be next.

Srategic importance of Poland

Poland is currently not just the main link geographically between Nato and Ukraine, but also the area that could also be the future likely battleground, should Russia and Nato find themselves at war. Putin believes in the Brezhnev Doctrine. He wants to reverse the dismemberment of the Soviet Union and to restore Russian power to what it was before 1990.

Not only must he recover Ukraine, but also force Nato to retreat from Eastern Europe, and Poland in particular. At each step, he has also threatened to use tactical nuclear weapons. So, behind its seemingly secure Nato border, Poland has to perform a careful balancing act.

Before war broke out 59 percent of Poles wanted their country to help Ukraine militarily in the coming fight. Poland has supplied anti-aircraft ‘Patriot’ rocket batteries and considerable small arms ammunition to Ukraine from the very beginning. Poland also benefits from the presence of Nato troops from many countries as well as the new activation of the AEGIS medium-range missile system on the Baltic coast. Poland is due to have the protection of Britain’s Sky Sabre warning system against the Iskandar cruise missiles, which surround Poland from the Kaliningrad enclave in the north and from the Russian army in Belarus to the east.

Nato support for Ukraine

Instinctively Poles would have been happy to offer Ukraine even more substantial military assistance. However, the Poles are restricted by having to conform to Nato’s agreed joint strategy, as they do not want to find themselves isolated by breaking Nato ranks and provoking a Russian response against Poland alone. In the meantime, Nato has to temper its support for Ukraine by not provoking a nuclear conflict.

That is why the deal announced by EU officials that Poland was to hand over 27 Soviet-style MiG fighters to Ukraine backfired. The Polish government jumped the gun by offering publicly to leave the planes in a Nato base in Germany for the United States to hand over. However, President Biden vetoed the arrangement as being too risky, and this led to what appeared to be an open rift between Nato allies.

With hindsight it would have been better to have let the Ukrainians have the planes as a fait accompli without any fanfare. They would have been a useful extra tool for Ukrainian pilots trained on MiGs to attack Russian road convoys.

Poland and Ukraine

Poles see Ukraine as a necessary buffer between Poland and Russia, whose independence not only protects Poland, but also neutralises Russia’s ambition to be an aggressive imperialist state. This supersedes any historic resentment by elderly Poles against the mass murder of Poles by Ukrainian nationalists during the Second World War and the loss of its eastern territories, including Lviv, at the end of that war. It is important to stress here that Poland is not a revisionist state and is determined to remain within its post-1945 borders.

The Polish prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, was able to take the initiative by visiting President Zelenskyy in Kyiv last week, along with his Czech and Slovene counterparts. They travelled as representatives of the European Union and promised Zelenskyy a continuation of military and material support for Ukraine, but not the no-fly zone which Ukrainians had wanted. They could also promise a fast track for Ukraine’s membership of the European Union. Ostensibly this is not as provocative as membership of Nato, although to Putin an EU presence in Ukraine is as militarily provocative as Nato membership.

The visit was intended as a morale booster, which delighted the Ukrainians and visibly angered the Kremlin. Morawiecki was accompanied by the reclusive Polish political strongman Jaroslaw Kaczynski. He is the twin brother of President Lech Kaczynski who was killed in 2010 in an air accident over Russia, in circumstances which the remaining twin interprets as a political assassination. Ever a risk taker, Kaczynski floated an alternative option of an armed Nato humanitarian mission in Ukraine, but this initiative was not part of Nato or EU policy. Perhaps it would have been more sensible to suggest a UN mission.

Poles show overwhelming support and hospitality to Ukrainians

As compensation for their inability to help the Ukrainians’ war effort, the Poles have initiated a massive campaign of material and financial aid to Ukraine and have, literally, opened their doors to near two million Ukrainians, mainly women and children, who have poured across the border into their country. There is a deep sense of identity with Ukrainians. It has led to a generous and selfless eruption of hospitality that has surprised the world, particularly after the grim confrontations Poland had last year with Middle Eastern migrants driven onto Poland’s beleaguered border by Belarusian soldiers. 

This reaction seems even to have surprised the Polish government which had not prepared any refugee camps or government assistance points at stations or border crossings or legislated for any compensations payments to those who house Ukrainians. Yet the whole country acted like a levee en masse, with individuals, families, parishes, sports clubs, businesses, and local government organising a massive spontaneous countrywide effort from their own modest resources.

This came from a deep sense of common ethnic identity with a people whose country is facing a similar historical plight, and whose survival is essential for Poland’s security. This national effort to welcome Ukrainian refugees has inspired other countries to be generous too in their help, and to assist Poland in turn with financial and medical resources.

Formal support for Ukrainians from Poland’s government

The government is catching up, however. It has just passed new legislation to allow Ukrainians to apply for a national insurance number and thus to share the same rights to work, housing, and benefits as the indigenous population. Ukrainian children are being enrolled in Polish schools and a monthly subsidy is now being offered to all those who invite Ukrainians to stay in their homes. However, the mayors of Warsaw and Krakow have already stated that their population has increased by a third in the last three weeks. They cannot take more. Migrants now need to be moved to other parts of Poland or be sent further west.

The sanctions will hurt. Poland is already undergoing an 8 percent inflation rate, and this will rise further still. Poland will undoubtedly suffer too from a shortage of imported gas, 50 percent of which currently comes from Russia. Poland will have an alternative energy source, particularly with coal, oil, renewables, and nuclear energy. It also hopes to link up in the autumn to a new pipeline, the Baltic Pipe, sourcing its gas from Norway and carried safely through Denmark.

Time for Poland to unify and reconcile with the EU

A sense of a common national project in helping Ukraine and the fear of war spilling over into Poland has somewhat softened the deep and bitter divisions in Polish society. The traditional elderly Catholic rural Poland that supports the current nationalist government has faced a more liberal secular urban younger population that identifies with some of the opposition parties. The government had increased the divide by seeking to subordinate the judiciary and the media to government control. This has also led to confrontation with the EU institutions and with Poland’s western neighbours.

The conflict with the EU has led to a blockage in access to the €36bn post-covid recovery fund in Poland. Opposition leaders, like former European Council president, Donald Tusk, have drawn somewhat closer to President Andrzej Duda, who has also grown in stature during the last months, vetoing the more repressive government legislation and acting as the main European spokesperson for President Zelenskyy. The time has come for reconciliation with Europe and for the possibility of an all-party coalition, so that a unified Poland can face the threat of war and continue the massive relief effort.

Published in Yorkshire Bylines 19-03-2022

Sunday, 13 March 2022

The United Nations and the Ukraine crisis

 



Dear Editor,

Surely one significant avenue of diplomatic intervention that has not been properly utilized in challenging the Russian invasion of Ukraine was the UN General Assembly resolution of March 2nd, where 141 countries voted to demand that Russia "immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces from the territory of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders". It was invoked under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the same article that Putin used cynically to justify his invasion. 
On a number of occasions since the Uniting for Peace Resolution over Korea in 1950, the UN General Assembly had been able to circumvent the great power veto and take economic or even military measures for peace. It was invoked, for instance, over the crises in Suez, Congo, Lebanon and Namibia. In view of the existing strength of feeling in the UN, why could not the NATO powers seek a second emergency General Assembly resolution over Ukraine to confirm UN sanctions, institute humanitarian corridors in Ukraine, and even perhaps introduce a partial no fly zone in western Ukraine under a UN flag (and not a NATO flag). A challenge by the UN would be an additional obstacle to surmount for the troubled Russian ruling elite as it assesses the damage from Putin's war. Remember too that Ukraine had been a generous contributor to the UN's military peace missions and now deserves UN support. 
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski

Letter sent to The Economist

Saturday, 12 March 2022

UN Assembly underused by NATO in Ukraine crisis


 Dear Editor,

Patrick Cockburn's eloquent plea for NATO not to make the mistake of intervening in Ukraine ("Putin has already failed but Nato's errors may rescue him" i 10.03.22) fails because of one major factor. Putin's war is intended to weaken NATO and the EU, and to remove the United States as a guarantor of Europe's security. He wants NATO troops and rockets out of Poland and the Baltic States and to restore the pre-1990 status quo. Ukraine is merely the next stage in the conflict. Georgia, Crimea, Brexit, Trump's attempt to dismember NATO, were merely earlier phases of it. 
That is why Poland should supply its MiGs to Ukraine despite Biden suddenly developing cold feet. Also that is why Western countries should pull out every stop to have the UN administer humanitarian aid corridors in Ukraine and offer a preventative no fly zone over Western Ukraine. The general condemnation of Russia's invasion on March 2nd by the UN General Assembly, if repeated now, could circumvent Russian (and even possible Chinese) vetoes in the Security Council and act in accordance with Article 51 to intervene against war and to supply humanitarian aid in Ukraine. The UN had done this in the past, under Uniting for Peace resolutions, to protect Korea, Lebanon and Congo. 
It is ironic too that Ukraine until now has been one of the most generous countries to supply reliable troops on UN missions and that Putin justified his invasion under that same Article 51 in seeking to preserve the "independence" of the fictitious republics of Donetsk and Luhansk.  
One way or another, Putin must be stopped in his cynical bid to resuscitate Russian hegemony  in Eastern Europe and his nuclear threats exposed as bluff. Not even Russia wants nuclear war.
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski 

Copy of letter to Editor of "i"