Polish Londoner

These are the thoughts and moods of a born Londoner who is proud of his Polish roots.



Sunday 20 March 2022

Poland at a watershed as Russia’s war with Ukraine intensifies

 



In the last month Poland has become the centre of world attention, due in part to its role as the crucial land link to embattled Ukraine, and partly to the impressive way it offered safe haven for the three million refugees escaping from the Ukrainian battle zones. For adult Poles, however, the invasion of Ukraine is almost déjà vu.

Just as Poland in September 1939 fought alone against Hitler and Stalin, while the world looked on and expressed only moral support, so today Ukraine is defying Putin alone, while other countries like Poland sympathise but stand back. Yet, like France and Britain in 1939, Poland also knows that in 2022 it could be next.

Srategic importance of Poland

Poland is currently not just the main link geographically between Nato and Ukraine, but also the area that could also be the future likely battleground, should Russia and Nato find themselves at war. Putin believes in the Brezhnev Doctrine. He wants to reverse the dismemberment of the Soviet Union and to restore Russian power to what it was before 1990.

Not only must he recover Ukraine, but also force Nato to retreat from Eastern Europe, and Poland in particular. At each step, he has also threatened to use tactical nuclear weapons. So, behind its seemingly secure Nato border, Poland has to perform a careful balancing act.

Before war broke out 59 percent of Poles wanted their country to help Ukraine militarily in the coming fight. Poland has supplied anti-aircraft ‘Patriot’ rocket batteries and considerable small arms ammunition to Ukraine from the very beginning. Poland also benefits from the presence of Nato troops from many countries as well as the new activation of the AEGIS medium-range missile system on the Baltic coast. Poland is due to have the protection of Britain’s Sky Sabre warning system against the Iskandar cruise missiles, which surround Poland from the Kaliningrad enclave in the north and from the Russian army in Belarus to the east.

Nato support for Ukraine

Instinctively Poles would have been happy to offer Ukraine even more substantial military assistance. However, the Poles are restricted by having to conform to Nato’s agreed joint strategy, as they do not want to find themselves isolated by breaking Nato ranks and provoking a Russian response against Poland alone. In the meantime, Nato has to temper its support for Ukraine by not provoking a nuclear conflict.

That is why the deal announced by EU officials that Poland was to hand over 27 Soviet-style MiG fighters to Ukraine backfired. The Polish government jumped the gun by offering publicly to leave the planes in a Nato base in Germany for the United States to hand over. However, President Biden vetoed the arrangement as being too risky, and this led to what appeared to be an open rift between Nato allies.

With hindsight it would have been better to have let the Ukrainians have the planes as a fait accompli without any fanfare. They would have been a useful extra tool for Ukrainian pilots trained on MiGs to attack Russian road convoys.

Poland and Ukraine

Poles see Ukraine as a necessary buffer between Poland and Russia, whose independence not only protects Poland, but also neutralises Russia’s ambition to be an aggressive imperialist state. This supersedes any historic resentment by elderly Poles against the mass murder of Poles by Ukrainian nationalists during the Second World War and the loss of its eastern territories, including Lviv, at the end of that war. It is important to stress here that Poland is not a revisionist state and is determined to remain within its post-1945 borders.

The Polish prime minister, Mateusz Morawiecki, was able to take the initiative by visiting President Zelenskyy in Kyiv last week, along with his Czech and Slovene counterparts. They travelled as representatives of the European Union and promised Zelenskyy a continuation of military and material support for Ukraine, but not the no-fly zone which Ukrainians had wanted. They could also promise a fast track for Ukraine’s membership of the European Union. Ostensibly this is not as provocative as membership of Nato, although to Putin an EU presence in Ukraine is as militarily provocative as Nato membership.

The visit was intended as a morale booster, which delighted the Ukrainians and visibly angered the Kremlin. Morawiecki was accompanied by the reclusive Polish political strongman Jaroslaw Kaczynski. He is the twin brother of President Lech Kaczynski who was killed in 2010 in an air accident over Russia, in circumstances which the remaining twin interprets as a political assassination. Ever a risk taker, Kaczynski floated an alternative option of an armed Nato humanitarian mission in Ukraine, but this initiative was not part of Nato or EU policy. Perhaps it would have been more sensible to suggest a UN mission.

Poles show overwhelming support and hospitality to Ukrainians

As compensation for their inability to help the Ukrainians’ war effort, the Poles have initiated a massive campaign of material and financial aid to Ukraine and have, literally, opened their doors to near two million Ukrainians, mainly women and children, who have poured across the border into their country. There is a deep sense of identity with Ukrainians. It has led to a generous and selfless eruption of hospitality that has surprised the world, particularly after the grim confrontations Poland had last year with Middle Eastern migrants driven onto Poland’s beleaguered border by Belarusian soldiers. 

This reaction seems even to have surprised the Polish government which had not prepared any refugee camps or government assistance points at stations or border crossings or legislated for any compensations payments to those who house Ukrainians. Yet the whole country acted like a levee en masse, with individuals, families, parishes, sports clubs, businesses, and local government organising a massive spontaneous countrywide effort from their own modest resources.

This came from a deep sense of common ethnic identity with a people whose country is facing a similar historical plight, and whose survival is essential for Poland’s security. This national effort to welcome Ukrainian refugees has inspired other countries to be generous too in their help, and to assist Poland in turn with financial and medical resources.

Formal support for Ukrainians from Poland’s government

The government is catching up, however. It has just passed new legislation to allow Ukrainians to apply for a national insurance number and thus to share the same rights to work, housing, and benefits as the indigenous population. Ukrainian children are being enrolled in Polish schools and a monthly subsidy is now being offered to all those who invite Ukrainians to stay in their homes. However, the mayors of Warsaw and Krakow have already stated that their population has increased by a third in the last three weeks. They cannot take more. Migrants now need to be moved to other parts of Poland or be sent further west.

The sanctions will hurt. Poland is already undergoing an 8 percent inflation rate, and this will rise further still. Poland will undoubtedly suffer too from a shortage of imported gas, 50 percent of which currently comes from Russia. Poland will have an alternative energy source, particularly with coal, oil, renewables, and nuclear energy. It also hopes to link up in the autumn to a new pipeline, the Baltic Pipe, sourcing its gas from Norway and carried safely through Denmark.

Time for Poland to unify and reconcile with the EU

A sense of a common national project in helping Ukraine and the fear of war spilling over into Poland has somewhat softened the deep and bitter divisions in Polish society. The traditional elderly Catholic rural Poland that supports the current nationalist government has faced a more liberal secular urban younger population that identifies with some of the opposition parties. The government had increased the divide by seeking to subordinate the judiciary and the media to government control. This has also led to confrontation with the EU institutions and with Poland’s western neighbours.

The conflict with the EU has led to a blockage in access to the €36bn post-covid recovery fund in Poland. Opposition leaders, like former European Council president, Donald Tusk, have drawn somewhat closer to President Andrzej Duda, who has also grown in stature during the last months, vetoing the more repressive government legislation and acting as the main European spokesperson for President Zelenskyy. The time has come for reconciliation with Europe and for the possibility of an all-party coalition, so that a unified Poland can face the threat of war and continue the massive relief effort.

Published in Yorkshire Bylines 19-03-2022

Sunday 13 March 2022

The United Nations and the Ukraine crisis

 



Dear Editor,

Surely one significant avenue of diplomatic intervention that has not been properly utilized in challenging the Russian invasion of Ukraine was the UN General Assembly resolution of March 2nd, where 141 countries voted to demand that Russia "immediately, completely and unconditionally withdraw all of its military forces from the territory of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders". It was invoked under Article 51 of the UN Charter, the same article that Putin used cynically to justify his invasion. 
On a number of occasions since the Uniting for Peace Resolution over Korea in 1950, the UN General Assembly had been able to circumvent the great power veto and take economic or even military measures for peace. It was invoked, for instance, over the crises in Suez, Congo, Lebanon and Namibia. In view of the existing strength of feeling in the UN, why could not the NATO powers seek a second emergency General Assembly resolution over Ukraine to confirm UN sanctions, institute humanitarian corridors in Ukraine, and even perhaps introduce a partial no fly zone in western Ukraine under a UN flag (and not a NATO flag). A challenge by the UN would be an additional obstacle to surmount for the troubled Russian ruling elite as it assesses the damage from Putin's war. Remember too that Ukraine had been a generous contributor to the UN's military peace missions and now deserves UN support. 
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski

Letter sent to The Economist

Saturday 12 March 2022

UN Assembly underused by NATO in Ukraine crisis


 Dear Editor,

Patrick Cockburn's eloquent plea for NATO not to make the mistake of intervening in Ukraine ("Putin has already failed but Nato's errors may rescue him" i 10.03.22) fails because of one major factor. Putin's war is intended to weaken NATO and the EU, and to remove the United States as a guarantor of Europe's security. He wants NATO troops and rockets out of Poland and the Baltic States and to restore the pre-1990 status quo. Ukraine is merely the next stage in the conflict. Georgia, Crimea, Brexit, Trump's attempt to dismember NATO, were merely earlier phases of it. 
That is why Poland should supply its MiGs to Ukraine despite Biden suddenly developing cold feet. Also that is why Western countries should pull out every stop to have the UN administer humanitarian aid corridors in Ukraine and offer a preventative no fly zone over Western Ukraine. The general condemnation of Russia's invasion on March 2nd by the UN General Assembly, if repeated now, could circumvent Russian (and even possible Chinese) vetoes in the Security Council and act in accordance with Article 51 to intervene against war and to supply humanitarian aid in Ukraine. The UN had done this in the past, under Uniting for Peace resolutions, to protect Korea, Lebanon and Congo. 
It is ironic too that Ukraine until now has been one of the most generous countries to supply reliable troops on UN missions and that Putin justified his invasion under that same Article 51 in seeking to preserve the "independence" of the fictitious republics of Donetsk and Luhansk.  
One way or another, Putin must be stopped in his cynical bid to resuscitate Russian hegemony  in Eastern Europe and his nuclear threats exposed as bluff. Not even Russia wants nuclear war.
Yours faithfully,
Wiktor Moszczynski 

Copy of letter to Editor of "i"

Tuesday 8 March 2022

No Fly Zone over Ukraine? Yes, but under a UN flag

 



Letter to Sir Tobias Ellwood MP

House of Commons
London SW1A 0PP

From Wiktor Moszczynski, Polish lobbyist and journalist living in UK.


 

Dear Sir Tobias,


I note your consistent and laudable campaign to introduce a no fly zone over Ukraine.


I share with you the desire to help Ukraine in a more meaningful way than just the present financial sanctions, or the upgrading of defensive weapons in Eastern Europe or the supply of defensive weapons across the Polish border. The current impact of these measures is that the West is beating the serpent’s tail, while in Ukraine it is still biting and devouring its victims with increased ferocity. I am aware that currently NATO leaders are reluctant to step into Ukraine, despite President Zelensky's pleas, for fear of a Nuclear standoff. However, not all options have been considered. 

 

You are no doubt aware that, according to Article 51 of the UN Charter, a General Assembly resolution of “Uniting for Peace”, requiring only a majority vote, can instruct the UN Secretary General to take action, whether economic or military in nature, to enforce the peace in a conflict zone, in circumstances where the UN Security Council cannot act because of a veto by one, or more, of its 5 permanent members. This has been used to impose sanctions and even to instigate military interventions, as in Korea, Lebanon and Congo in the 1950s. Putin actually invoked this Article to justify his invasion of Ukraine.

 

Judging by the massive majority that voted to condemn the Russian invasion in the General Assembly on March 2nd. it would be quite possible to obtain a similar majority to a resolution imposing a no fly zone over Western and Southern Ukraine (including strategic cities such as Lviv, Zhitomir and Odessa). Clear rules of engagement should be agreed beforehand, and the Ukrainian government’s secret approval sought. It could be imposed currently without any conflict, as  Russian forces have not yet reached this part of Ukraine. The military forces in this exercise would come from various parts of the world, but obviously NATO countries’ forces could participate as well, but still under a UN flag.

 

At a more modest level, UN forces could at least vote to offer their services to provide humanitarian corridors to ensure safe passage for refugees and for supplying food and medical aid to civilian populations in central and eastern Ukraine, still fighting Russian troops.

 

It would be up to Russian forces to challenge a UN presence in Ukraine, and in doing so they would be challenging a fait accompli and acting as aggressors towards a force that represents all the countries that voted for this UN resolution. Putin could not use the argument that this is a NATO invasion, and NATO leaders could overcome their concern to avoid direct lethal contact between Russian and NATO forces.

 

UN forces would not intervene directly in the battle for Kyiv or Kharkiv, but this measure would ensure the survival of independent Ukrainian territory in the west, as a stepping off point to continue the struggle further east. It would give much needed relief to the overall Ukrainian war effort and to civilian morale. It could reduce the number of refugees leaving Ukraine. It would also add to Putin’s difficulty of justifying to the Russian people why their leader has led them into a conflict, not just with Ukraine or NATO, but with the rest of the world.


If you agree with me please put these views forward to the government and to your own parliamentary committee.


Yours sincerely,


Wiktor Moszczynski